The women-

(left to right)
Lois Ng, Maureen Ong, Josie Lau, Charlotte Wong, Jenica Chua, Sally Ang

Just moments into Josie’s presidential speech, the hall erupted in mayhem as Aware members realised that the microphones offstage were off when people sought to raise questions about controversial points.
There were eight placed around the hall, “dummy mikes”, they were later called.

Braema Mathi, ex-CEDAW committee chairperson, tried to tell Josie that the old guards were there for one reason and one reason only, she found that other mikes were off.
She was later even offered a loudhailer from an old guard supporter but when she showed signs of wanting to use it to be heard, guards began approaching her, threatening to remove it.
As old guard supporters shouted for them to be turned on, first Sally, then Josie, called for the security guards present to escort them out.
An even greater uproar ensued as people shook fists, shouted angrily and questioned the call for the ‘manhandling’.
And then just moments later, Sally Ang told an old guard representative: “Shut up and sit down”, and the supporters went made people were overheard saying “how dare she tell anyone to shut up”.
Quickly, Josie apologised, twice, but it was not to be enough for the insulted people belowstage. They called for Sally to apologised, and she eventually barked into the microphone: “Accept my apologies but I hope you all can let the president finish her speech without interrupting.”
Amidst the riled crowd, old guard legal advisor, Siew Kum Hong, and Braema, gestured to remind members to remain calm and non-confrontational.
Minutes later, the microphones were turned on.
An old guard supporter who held the floor later said :”I didn’t expect to come to a grown-up organisation to be told to shut up and sit down. This is definitely not the time to shut up and sit down. It is the time to stand up and be heard.”
However, the microphones were later turned off intermittently, sometimes because “the floor is not yet open”, other times due to faulty PA systems, which allowed yet another avenue for the pack of old guard supporters a point to pick on – poor organisation.
Celebrity Irene Ang shouted:”Did you pay $40 for this kind of service?”, angry that the old guards were repeatedly cut off mid-sentence.
The crowd roared with approval as small groups of people, assumed to be new guard supporters, sat in stoic silence.
Finally, after much time spent in a shouting match, Poonam from the old guard called for the first point of order – that constitution (3) be moved to be voted on first.
It was approved, but not before Josie plead for the members to allow her to finish her speech.
Josie moved on to present the history of Aware.
“No need! What for? Hurry up and move on!” were heard all over the hall, as the majority present told her to begin the vote.
Josie flashed a graph showing how Aware had once only had 283 members but as of 30 April, the organisation had grown to 2,800 members.
“You think its because of you that membership grew? It’s not, it’s because the old guards have earned our respect, trust and loyalty!” shouted an old guard supporter when her turn at the microphone came.
As she tried to present the profiles of the new ( now old ) exco, there were jeers and anger around as they shouted for her to “stop wasting time”.
She was asked to flash through the slides, and she complied.
Just as she ended, Thio Su Mien stepped up to speak.
Introducing herself as the ‘first female law dean’, the hall was filled with shouts for her to stop talking.

The crowd looked like they were about to pounce on her with intent of attacking her, and the guards quickly closed in, worried for her safety.
After saying her piece, she went back to her seat, but her presence had increased the level of tension.
Even as the voting began, the old guard called for their own scrutineers to be permitted, which was met with the usual “let us consult our legal council”, which was done once too many, that the audience began to scoff at the new guard’s behavior – ‘legal tactics’, it was called.
In addition to the scrutineer company – Deloites – employed, representatives of the Boardroom who went around collecting the votes of no confidence were also watched with hawk eyes by an old guard scrutineer.

As the votes were being counted, Aware members wishing to speak into the microphone formed a straight line to wait.
A speaker went to the microphone to voice an observation: “How can I be confident that you will fight for equal women’s rights when you don’t treat us equally? ”
And when the question of why Constance Singam was asked to step out of the room at an exco meeting though she was to be their advisor, Josie said: “I asked Constance Singam to step out because we had to discuss sensitive issues.”
A question, earlier raised by an old guard member, was also rehashed.
“Even if you cannot give us a precise amount, at least give us an estimate of how much you have spent in the one month you have been in office.”
And after much hemming and hawwing, Maureen said: “…a rough estimate would be about 90 thousand,” to which there were shouts of appall at the amount that had been spent on the EGM.
Ms Tay, old guard supporter and volunteer said: “How could they spend that amount? Do you know how long it takes to raise $90,000 anot!”
And when a member of the new guard announced that since the new membership of Aware had brought in $120,000, and therefore the ‘net profit’ would be $30,000, there was even more anger at their audacity.
One man, who introduced himself as a Muslim father with three daughters, said to the crowd when his turn came: “I support the sexuality education programme conducted by Aware.”

To this, as well as many other pro-old guard speakers who spoke with passion and fervour, the hall would burst into deafening applause, cheering and ‘We are aware’ flag waving.
Points in the Constitution were raised disallowing leaders of Aware from spending more than 20k without seeking approval from its members, as there was continued discussio
Several speakers later, Su Mien reappeared and wrestled the sole microphone from an Aware member who has waited in line with tens of others for his turn to speak.

She lifted a book she had been holding, and people started asking “Is she carrying a Bible?”.
Jabbing her finger at the book, which turned out to be <Small Steps, Giant Leaps: A History of AWARE and the Women’s Movement in Singapore>, she said: “I am in this book, on page 73.”
Old guard supporters jumped to their feet, shouting at her to join the queue and wait for her turn.
Opening the book, she shouted at the crowd: “I am very proud you put me in this. Since you put me in this book, I think you should tear it up!”
Su Mien was later told by one of the old guard supporters: “You call yourself the feminist mentor. But I know for sure I don’t want you to be my mentor.”
And for most part of the conference, as the votes were being counted, women, and men who were there to be heard, made themselves heard.
Some came with the introduction “I am very nervous”, while others attacked the actions of the new guards with carefully thought-out arguments. Some spoke with full confidence, a few broke down in tears while speaking about their beliefs.
But the scene was one that saw an audience, more lively than at the Singapore elections, as was quipped by many. The emotions were charged and raw, the passion all real, and the people were there to move – they did.
In Aware, I now have restored faith that all women and minorities will be represented and protected.
Recent Comments